Relationship recognition for gay couples in NSW moved one step forward tonight after the government passed the relationship register in the lower house with the bill passing 62 votes to 9. After just three hours of debate.
Under the bill, same-sex couples will be able to legally register their relationships and receive the same legal entitlements as married couples.
It is also expected to pass when the bill goes to the upper house with the support of the Greens.
Among those who spoke in support of the bill were several Labor MPs including Gerard Martin, Carmel Tebbutt and Verity Firth, as well as Independent MP Clover Moore.
Opposition leader, Liberal, Barry O’Farrell supported the bill but the current NSW Premier Kristina Keneally was absent from the debate.
Liberal MP Peter Debnam, who was in support of the register, highlighted the premier’s absence as well as her Catholic beliefs, and urged her to state her position in relation to the bill. During the debate, parliament heard concerns that the bill will undermine the institution of marriage, threaten traditional families, and have implications on state adoption laws. Speaking against the bill, Nationals Leader Andrew Stoner expressed concern in the government allowing couples who are unable to marry obtain formal recognition through the registry. He also feared that the definition of ‘de facto relationship’ will be expanded to include a new description – ‘registered relationships’.
“It is my belief that these provisions represent a significant erosion of the concept and institution of marriage in our society,” Stoner said.
The ease in which couples can register their relationships was also matter of concern.
Liberal MP Rob Stokes questioned the bill’s purpose, saying “nothing in this bill makes anyone more equal than anyone else”.
“A register does nothing to make a relationship better,” he said.
Greg Smith, the Liberal MP for Epping, feared that the bill would pave the way for same-sex adoption.
Several MPs also raised concern at the speed in which the bill was introduced and the late hour in which it was being debated. Debnam questioned why the bill was pushed through at an unscheduled night sitting of parliament, on the same night the federal government releasesd its budget.
"Bearing that in mind, one could reach only one conclusion about this bill: the Government is trying to hide it. And that is a sad state of affairs, because the bill is very important and many people would like to hear about it," Debnam said.
Labor MP Barry Collier, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Attorney General, moved to address these concerns, saying the bill “does not seek to replace the institution of marriage” as the Marriage Act is under federal law.
Gay activists has publicly stated that although it is a step forward to equality - it is nothing more than the process of registering a pet dog with the council, and possibly another attempt at government to financially benefit from same sex couples (via taxation etc) without delivering them full equality granted to heterosexual coupled citizens.
Rallies are planned for this Saturday in major cities throughout Australia for the further push of same sex marriage rights.
Browser Extension AdBlock has been detected.
Please turn it off to browse our website.